Why in the hell does Larry King think the news watching populous give a rats ass about hollywood actors opinions on politics and other national issues? I don't give a shit what Whoopi Goldberg thinks about Miss CA! Who the hell is Whoopi? What has she done except act? Her opinion is worth no more than an anomous citizen. Actually, she lives in the fake world of Hollywood, her opinions are worth so much LESS than the working people of America!
I for one, am damn tired of the liberal media catering to the liberal actors. Actors are so far detached from reality, that's why they're actors! They are fake! Not only that, the can actually afford to be liberal because they are overpaid for "faking" it! In reality most actors are liberal and pure hypocrites! They plead for the average working citizen to buy this or donate that for some publicity cause when the actors have millions they don't donate because they think their appearance at a charity event is enough. Bunch of damn hypocrites...George Clooney, you're the head hypocrite!
So, why does Larry King think Whoopi's opinion is of any value whatsoever? It isn't! Its pure crap coming from a hypocrite that can afford to be liberal! If she worked for a living, and actually contributed to society in some meaningful way, then Larry might be justified in asking her questions.
Friday, May 8, 2009
Wednesday, April 22, 2009
Miss California has the Right to her beliefs too!!!
A gay blogger, Perez Hilton, who somehow snuck his way into the spotlight, asked Miss California what her beliefs where on gay marriage. In response Miss California described her beliefs of marriage as between a man and a woman.
Now, liberal Hollywood IDIOTS are up in arms because someone has an opinion different than theirs. What a bunch of friggin hypocrites! I guess the Hollywood theme is, "free speech so long as it agrees with that of liberal celebrities."
Well, Hollywood, when you actually contribute to society in meaningful way other than the sorry ass job of "acting" and getting WAY overpaid for it, then you and your opinions might matter. Until then, shut the f**k up.
Now, liberal Hollywood IDIOTS are up in arms because someone has an opinion different than theirs. What a bunch of friggin hypocrites! I guess the Hollywood theme is, "free speech so long as it agrees with that of liberal celebrities."
Well, Hollywood, when you actually contribute to society in meaningful way other than the sorry ass job of "acting" and getting WAY overpaid for it, then you and your opinions might matter. Until then, shut the f**k up.
Sunday, April 5, 2009
We The People
"We the People" does not apply to the world population. It applies to the legal citizens of the United States of America.
Illegal aliens and the terrorists at Gitmo do not have rights under our Constitution. So, why does our government feel the need to pay for attorneys for illegals and terrorists?
Illegal aliens and the terrorists at Gitmo do not have rights under our Constitution. So, why does our government feel the need to pay for attorneys for illegals and terrorists?
Tuesday, March 31, 2009
Middle Class Growth
It seems as if the new Administration's plan to grow middle class is only surpassed by its plan to grow government! The two are directly related as the big government plan also includes to idea of increasing dependency on governmentt therefore increasing government power over the people.
Ponder this, the federal government and some states are raising taxes on higher income persons and businesses. This effectively lowers the personal income of said government determined "wealthy" to a tier in the middle class, thus enlarging the middle class.
The increased taxes on the "wealthy" are not used to help the middle class as the Obama promised, the taxes are being used to grow government and its powers over the people.
Liberty is going away people, you should fear for our great nation
Ponder this, the federal government and some states are raising taxes on higher income persons and businesses. This effectively lowers the personal income of said government determined "wealthy" to a tier in the middle class, thus enlarging the middle class.
The increased taxes on the "wealthy" are not used to help the middle class as the Obama promised, the taxes are being used to grow government and its powers over the people.
Liberty is going away people, you should fear for our great nation
Thursday, March 26, 2009
The Only Changes
The current administration's campaign theme was "change you can believe in."
Well, the only changes the American populous has been subjected to are detrimental to the very core of democracy and capitalism, both of which have provided the foundation that the global success of the United States has been built on.
Change for the sake of change is not good. In fact, change is a very destructive concept when applied for the sake of itself.
We, the United States, has seen one change so far that will ultimately result in our demise as a democracy and the economic cornerstone of the global system. That change is two fold. First, our current administration has embarked on a path that leads to socialism, punishing those that work hard to achieve what they perceive will afford them liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Secondly, the unprecedented growth in the size of government and the the powers it has over the people that have worked very hard fro what they have.
After all the complaining and concern about the Patriot Act, there is not so much as a mumble about the over-reaching powers the new administration has grasped and are seeking. These multiple new powers the new admin desires and has given itself will destroy the fabric of American ingenuity. The power of the government to determine salaries of company executives will diminish the drive and desire of people to achieve such success. The government control of the US financial market is akin to that of the former Soviet Union.
Socialism didn't work in the USSR, it is not working in China, and it's certainly not going to work here in the Land of the FREE and the Home of the Brave, the United States of America!
Well, the only changes the American populous has been subjected to are detrimental to the very core of democracy and capitalism, both of which have provided the foundation that the global success of the United States has been built on.
Change for the sake of change is not good. In fact, change is a very destructive concept when applied for the sake of itself.
We, the United States, has seen one change so far that will ultimately result in our demise as a democracy and the economic cornerstone of the global system. That change is two fold. First, our current administration has embarked on a path that leads to socialism, punishing those that work hard to achieve what they perceive will afford them liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Secondly, the unprecedented growth in the size of government and the the powers it has over the people that have worked very hard fro what they have.
After all the complaining and concern about the Patriot Act, there is not so much as a mumble about the over-reaching powers the new administration has grasped and are seeking. These multiple new powers the new admin desires and has given itself will destroy the fabric of American ingenuity. The power of the government to determine salaries of company executives will diminish the drive and desire of people to achieve such success. The government control of the US financial market is akin to that of the former Soviet Union.
Socialism didn't work in the USSR, it is not working in China, and it's certainly not going to work here in the Land of the FREE and the Home of the Brave, the United States of America!
Wednesday, March 25, 2009
"Blame America First"
Our new Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, has decided that Mexico's drug problem is America's fault.
Well Madam Secretary, how exactly is it our fault? What the hell are you thinking traveling the world and talking trash about the great nation that has so richly blessed you?
Well Madam Secretary, how exactly is it our fault? What the hell are you thinking traveling the world and talking trash about the great nation that has so richly blessed you?
Message to new Admin and fans of it
You are not the saviors of the US, you have no special powers. You will not accept responsibility for the economy, you pawn that off on the prior admin. You're one helluva salesman but that's it.
You cannot pay off a 1.87-ish trillion dollar deficit by tripling it or quadrupling it. Go back to school and take some math and economics classes.
You cannot pay off a 1.87-ish trillion dollar deficit by tripling it or quadrupling it. Go back to school and take some math and economics classes.
Wednesday, March 18, 2009
Speaker Pelosi is Un-American
Speaker Pelosi continues to sell out American citizens! Does not one of her constituents, the ones that are LEGAL, not have the balls to tell her that she is a member of the Congress of the United States of America and therefore works for the American people, not the illegal aliens?
Does Speaker Pelosi not understand that the laws of our nation should be written for the greater good of our citizens and not those that are here illegally? Laws are meant to protect the innocent, not the criminals, and illegal aliens are just that, criminals!
Does Speaker Pelosi not realize that illegal aliens are law breakers, criminals in the eyes of the law? Does Pelosi endorse violations of United States laws? How can the senior member of the United States Congress endorse law breaking behavior?
Nancy Pelosi is criticizing the federal and state agencies that raid known locations of illegal immigrant gatherings in order to enforce our nation's laws. She actually called our immigration laws "un-American". What is so damn un-American about expecting our state and federal immigration agencies to do their jobs? What is so un-American about arresting and deporting illegal aliens? Those in our country are called "illegal" aliens for a reason Speaker! Because they are here ILLEGALLY and therefore are breaking the laws of our great nation and therefore are criminals! People that want to allow violations of our immigration laws in order to promote themselves or their interests are un-American...when are you up for election Speaker? Do you need a little help from the Hispanic vote?
How in the hell can anyone vote for someone that sacrifices American laws for votes and personal gain?
Does Speaker Pelosi not understand that the laws of our nation should be written for the greater good of our citizens and not those that are here illegally? Laws are meant to protect the innocent, not the criminals, and illegal aliens are just that, criminals!
Does Speaker Pelosi not realize that illegal aliens are law breakers, criminals in the eyes of the law? Does Pelosi endorse violations of United States laws? How can the senior member of the United States Congress endorse law breaking behavior?
Nancy Pelosi is criticizing the federal and state agencies that raid known locations of illegal immigrant gatherings in order to enforce our nation's laws. She actually called our immigration laws "un-American". What is so damn un-American about expecting our state and federal immigration agencies to do their jobs? What is so un-American about arresting and deporting illegal aliens? Those in our country are called "illegal" aliens for a reason Speaker! Because they are here ILLEGALLY and therefore are breaking the laws of our great nation and therefore are criminals! People that want to allow violations of our immigration laws in order to promote themselves or their interests are un-American...when are you up for election Speaker? Do you need a little help from the Hispanic vote?
How in the hell can anyone vote for someone that sacrifices American laws for votes and personal gain?
Immigration Reform
Some immigration issues to think about.
Currently, if a pregnant illegal alien, a United States law violating criminal, gives birth to her child on American soil, even though she is here illegally, that child is, by virtue of his/her birth location, an American citizen.
With that in mind, Speaker Pelosi (D-CA) has argued that raids to rid our nation of the illegal alien leaches are cruel because these raids force parents that are illegally in our nation out of our nation while the children remain, as citizens.
Ponder this, what if our laws professed that if an illegal alien, again, a criminal, gives birth to a child while on American soil, then that child shall not be considered an American citizen. If the United States laws were written such that to serve the best interest of American citizens, then when the federal and state agencies raided locations known to house illegal aliens the parents and children would be deported. Simply put, if the parent had not been here illegally then the child would not have been born here. Common sense approach to a serious problem in our nation.
Currently, if a pregnant illegal alien, a United States law violating criminal, gives birth to her child on American soil, even though she is here illegally, that child is, by virtue of his/her birth location, an American citizen.
With that in mind, Speaker Pelosi (D-CA) has argued that raids to rid our nation of the illegal alien leaches are cruel because these raids force parents that are illegally in our nation out of our nation while the children remain, as citizens.
Ponder this, what if our laws professed that if an illegal alien, again, a criminal, gives birth to a child while on American soil, then that child shall not be considered an American citizen. If the United States laws were written such that to serve the best interest of American citizens, then when the federal and state agencies raided locations known to house illegal aliens the parents and children would be deported. Simply put, if the parent had not been here illegally then the child would not have been born here. Common sense approach to a serious problem in our nation.
Sunday, February 15, 2009
Tax Assistance Attorney Commercials
Are you sick and tired of seeing commercials by tax attorneys with former customers claiming, for example, "I owed over 800 thousand dollars in taxes and "so-and-so" tax firm made it so that I only had to pay 15 thousand."?
How about this...if you would have paid your damn taxes like the rest of us you wouldn't be in that position. How about those customers send every taxpayer in the country a "thank you" card because we picked up their slack.
I find it very frustrating, even anger inducing, that these leaches on America didn't pay their taxes and then do a commercial about how they made the rest of the taxpayers cover their slack! There is no excuse.
Of course, with our new executive branch and it's appointees not paying their taxes, or the penalties that accompany the late payment of taxes, I suppose the populous had a bad example, at least for 2009 and beyond.
How about this...if you would have paid your damn taxes like the rest of us you wouldn't be in that position. How about those customers send every taxpayer in the country a "thank you" card because we picked up their slack.
I find it very frustrating, even anger inducing, that these leaches on America didn't pay their taxes and then do a commercial about how they made the rest of the taxpayers cover their slack! There is no excuse.
Of course, with our new executive branch and it's appointees not paying their taxes, or the penalties that accompany the late payment of taxes, I suppose the populous had a bad example, at least for 2009 and beyond.
Thursday, February 12, 2009
The Republik of Kalifornia and its Followers
Virtually all the cable news networks (yes, even Fox News) have been completely fascinated with the single, poor, living with her parents, welfare-collecting, jobless, already a mother of 6 that was intentionally impregnated and had octuplets. While it really is not news that the reasonable people care about, the media continues to broadcast the story like the country's national security or well being is dependent on this woman's story. This is not news! It's the kind of stuff that Dr. Phil and Jerry Springer have made a living off of. Let them keep making a living and let the news media report real news!
Oh, wait a minute, perhaps a few more than a couple people care. Perhaps there are people that don't subscribe to tabloids that care. Who might these people be? Well, apparently there is an uproar in Kalifornia about who is paying for this woman and her 14 kids since she is jobless, poor and already leaching off the federal and state governments...collecting welfare.
First, let me reassure you that I am not a proponent of any type of welfare system. I think it creates a dependency on the government, reinforces laziness and removes personal responsibility from those that should be held accountable for their actions.
With that said, those in Kalifornia, and the rest of the country as well, that are complaining about paying for this woman and her 14 children, should have been complaining long ago, long before this particular woman had any children, perhaps even before this woman was born. They should have been complaining long ago when Kalifornia willingly began ignoring the influx of illegal aliens and paying for illegal aliens to reside in their state, but they didn't want to deal with the process of ridding the state of the infestation of illegal aliens. They should have demanded that the state deport those that are illegally here in the United States and send the bill to the government of Mexico. Now, with the largest population of criminals (illegal aliens) of any state in the Union, they decide to whine about who is paying for this American woman and her 14 kids. What about the over 11 million illegals that are leaching off the state and federal governments? Too late to start bitching now Kalifornia! You missed that opportunity.
Kalifornia has the largest debt of any state in the Union, approximately $41 BILLION. Imagine how much of that debt could have been prevented had the citizens demanded that the state deport the illegals long ago. Imagine how much of that debt could have been prevented had the state initiated action to deport illegals rather than sit on it's collective ass and claim that removing illegal aliens is the federal government's responsibility.
Kalifornia has over 11 million illegal aliens, criminals, that it is willingly supporting yet now there are those that are whining about an American woman and her 14 children. Are you kidding me?! That is absolutely ridiculous and is pure hypocrisy!
Oh, wait a minute, perhaps a few more than a couple people care. Perhaps there are people that don't subscribe to tabloids that care. Who might these people be? Well, apparently there is an uproar in Kalifornia about who is paying for this woman and her 14 kids since she is jobless, poor and already leaching off the federal and state governments...collecting welfare.
First, let me reassure you that I am not a proponent of any type of welfare system. I think it creates a dependency on the government, reinforces laziness and removes personal responsibility from those that should be held accountable for their actions.
With that said, those in Kalifornia, and the rest of the country as well, that are complaining about paying for this woman and her 14 children, should have been complaining long ago, long before this particular woman had any children, perhaps even before this woman was born. They should have been complaining long ago when Kalifornia willingly began ignoring the influx of illegal aliens and paying for illegal aliens to reside in their state, but they didn't want to deal with the process of ridding the state of the infestation of illegal aliens. They should have demanded that the state deport those that are illegally here in the United States and send the bill to the government of Mexico. Now, with the largest population of criminals (illegal aliens) of any state in the Union, they decide to whine about who is paying for this American woman and her 14 kids. What about the over 11 million illegals that are leaching off the state and federal governments? Too late to start bitching now Kalifornia! You missed that opportunity.
Kalifornia has the largest debt of any state in the Union, approximately $41 BILLION. Imagine how much of that debt could have been prevented had the citizens demanded that the state deport the illegals long ago. Imagine how much of that debt could have been prevented had the state initiated action to deport illegals rather than sit on it's collective ass and claim that removing illegal aliens is the federal government's responsibility.
Kalifornia has over 11 million illegal aliens, criminals, that it is willingly supporting yet now there are those that are whining about an American woman and her 14 children. Are you kidding me?! That is absolutely ridiculous and is pure hypocrisy!
Tuesday, February 10, 2009
Pork Loving Pelosi and the Liberal Media
Recently there has been information floating around about the Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi (D) of San Francisco, CA.
Interesting that Mrs. Pelosi, on the coat-tails of Obama, preached the negative aspects of "earmarks" and "pork" in legislation (of course after John McCain called the Democrats on it during the campaign), yet at the same time she added her own "pork" to the latest stimulus package designed to stimulate the economy.
"First Female Speaker of the House, and one of the dumbest (she was quoted as saying,"Natural Gas is a renewable resource") and most corrupt. You never hear about this in the media because it is not politically correct.
Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi's home district includes San Francisco . Star-Kist Tuna's headquarters are in San Francisco, Pelosi's home district. Star-Kist is owned by Del Monte Foods and is a major contributor to Pelosi. Star-Kist is the major employer in American Samoa employing 75% of the Samoan work force. Paul Pelosi, Nancy's husband, owns $17 million dollars of Star-Kist stock. In January, 2007 when the minimum wage was increased from $5.15 to $7.25, Pelosi had American Samoa exempted from the increase so Del Monte would not have to pay the higher wage. This would make Del Monte products less expensive than their competition's. Last week when the huge bailout bill was passed, Pelosi added an earmark to the final bill adding $33 million dollars for an 'economic development credit in American Samoa '.
Pelosi has called the Bush Administration "CORRUPT" ? ? "
How do you spell "HYPOCRISY" ?......P-E-L-O-S-I
How exactly is a $33 billion economic development credit going to "create jobs" in the United States as the Speaker and President have promised over and over and over and over that the "stimulus" bill would do?
Interesting that Mrs. Pelosi, on the coat-tails of Obama, preached the negative aspects of "earmarks" and "pork" in legislation (of course after John McCain called the Democrats on it during the campaign), yet at the same time she added her own "pork" to the latest stimulus package designed to stimulate the economy.
"First Female Speaker of the House, and one of the dumbest (she was quoted as saying,"Natural Gas is a renewable resource") and most corrupt. You never hear about this in the media because it is not politically correct.
Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi's home district includes San Francisco . Star-Kist Tuna's headquarters are in San Francisco, Pelosi's home district. Star-Kist is owned by Del Monte Foods and is a major contributor to Pelosi. Star-Kist is the major employer in American Samoa employing 75% of the Samoan work force. Paul Pelosi, Nancy's husband, owns $17 million dollars of Star-Kist stock. In January, 2007 when the minimum wage was increased from $5.15 to $7.25, Pelosi had American Samoa exempted from the increase so Del Monte would not have to pay the higher wage. This would make Del Monte products less expensive than their competition's. Last week when the huge bailout bill was passed, Pelosi added an earmark to the final bill adding $33 million dollars for an 'economic development credit in American Samoa '.
Pelosi has called the Bush Administration "CORRUPT" ? ? "
How do you spell "HYPOCRISY" ?......P-E-L-O-S-I
How exactly is a $33 billion economic development credit going to "create jobs" in the United States as the Speaker and President have promised over and over and over and over that the "stimulus" bill would do?
Friday, February 6, 2009
The Liberal Media and Their General Acceptance of Illegal Aliens
The American populous has been bombarded with non-stop stories of outrage regarding the single, poor, living with her parents, jobless, already a mother of 6 that just had octuplets. Fourteen children! Media outrage about who is paying for these kids, who is footing the medical bill and the long term welfare of the children is certainly justified. However, this same thing happens every day as illegal aliens cross our boarders and give birth to children in our hospitals. Who pays for them? Who provides care for them? We do folks, the American taxpayer! Where is the outrage and disgust over the billions we pay for criminals (illegal aliens) to have children in our hospitals?
Tuesday, February 3, 2009
Where is the liberal media now????
After the long and tough Presidential campaign between Obama and McCain, during which the liberal media's love affair with Obama was more than obvious, a great deal of attention and criticism was hurled at the McCain camp about the vetting process as it pertained to Gov. Sarah Palin.
Well, now the dust has settled, Obama is now President Obama, Senator McCain has returned to serving our nation as a Senator and Gov. Palin is doing Alaska's business.
President Obama has nominated more than a couple shady characters to fill the various secretary positions, even a new post he came up with. His nominee for and now confirmed Secretary of the Treasury has a more than questionable background as it applies to paying taxes, and now he is going to run the IRS. Tom Daschle withdrew his name from the nomination for Secretary of Health and Human Services due to the shady tax evasion practices he embraced. President Obama's own, brand new, "Performance" chief/secretary...whatever, has also withdrawn her name from consideration for unknown reasons (unknown so far).
With all that said, one cannot help but wonder where the liberal media has been. Where are the endless questions, commentary and speculations regarding the Obama administration's vetting process, or lack thereof, for the aforementioned characters? President Obama has been reported as saying that he still has confidence in the vetting process....what vetting process....
Well, now the dust has settled, Obama is now President Obama, Senator McCain has returned to serving our nation as a Senator and Gov. Palin is doing Alaska's business.
President Obama has nominated more than a couple shady characters to fill the various secretary positions, even a new post he came up with. His nominee for and now confirmed Secretary of the Treasury has a more than questionable background as it applies to paying taxes, and now he is going to run the IRS. Tom Daschle withdrew his name from the nomination for Secretary of Health and Human Services due to the shady tax evasion practices he embraced. President Obama's own, brand new, "Performance" chief/secretary...whatever, has also withdrawn her name from consideration for unknown reasons (unknown so far).
With all that said, one cannot help but wonder where the liberal media has been. Where are the endless questions, commentary and speculations regarding the Obama administration's vetting process, or lack thereof, for the aforementioned characters? President Obama has been reported as saying that he still has confidence in the vetting process....what vetting process....
Sunday, February 1, 2009
Bias
As I watch news report after news report about the dire straits of the people in KY and AR, particularly Louisville, KY, I can only wonder how much outrage and bitterness would be expressed via the media regarding the slow, and deficient response of the government if the President was a Republican.
I can't help but wonder how it is tied to the partisan split in the media. For example, after Hurricane Katrina, how long did it take the liberally slanted media to compalin about the lethargic response of the Bush Administration. Well, now that the media has gotten Barack Obama elected as our 44 th President, where is the outrage, where are the constant broadcasts showing outraged citizens of KY, where are the constant media complaints about the lethargic response of the Obama Administration to the 600K to 1 million people in KY alone that have been without power in freezing temperatures?
Wait a minute....could it possibly be because the majority of the population affected by the storm is not black? Could it be because the President is black (well half anyway), could it be because the media has a love affair with President Obama?
Where was the Red Cross when those in KY were powerless in freezing temperatures? Oh, wait a minute, perhaps the media NOW thinks it is the governor's responsibility. Why was it the President's responsibility when Katrina hit, but now it is the governor's responsibility? How come President Obama didn't activate hundreds of thousands of reserve military troops to assist in the rehabilitation of Louisville, for example? Why is the media not broadcasting over and over and over and over again the hardships of the American citizens of KY like they did in New Orleans? Hmmmmmmmmmm? Kind of makes one wonder a bit doesn't it!
What do you think?
I can't help but wonder how it is tied to the partisan split in the media. For example, after Hurricane Katrina, how long did it take the liberally slanted media to compalin about the lethargic response of the Bush Administration. Well, now that the media has gotten Barack Obama elected as our 44 th President, where is the outrage, where are the constant broadcasts showing outraged citizens of KY, where are the constant media complaints about the lethargic response of the Obama Administration to the 600K to 1 million people in KY alone that have been without power in freezing temperatures?
Wait a minute....could it possibly be because the majority of the population affected by the storm is not black? Could it be because the President is black (well half anyway), could it be because the media has a love affair with President Obama?
Where was the Red Cross when those in KY were powerless in freezing temperatures? Oh, wait a minute, perhaps the media NOW thinks it is the governor's responsibility. Why was it the President's responsibility when Katrina hit, but now it is the governor's responsibility? How come President Obama didn't activate hundreds of thousands of reserve military troops to assist in the rehabilitation of Louisville, for example? Why is the media not broadcasting over and over and over and over again the hardships of the American citizens of KY like they did in New Orleans? Hmmmmmmmmmm? Kind of makes one wonder a bit doesn't it!
What do you think?
Friday, January 30, 2009
Anti-Christian Bias in Schools
Recently I learned that a school district in Missouri is affording Muslim students a designated area in the school library for prayer. While most Muslim students in this particular school pray during their lunch time, the school has afforded them a place for religious activities at school. While most may feel that it is ok to provide these accommodations, and it very well may be, we must ask if the same accommodations are being afforded to Christian students.
The separation of church and state argument has been going on for years and has even reached the point where a single person in California can impact the rights and lives of hundreds of thousands of others by protesting a "moment of silence" at the beginning of school, or the mention of God in the Pledge of Allegiance.
So, have we become such a politically correct (better termed ass-kissing) nation such that we hand cuff the majority of Americans at the demand of a few and at the same time afford minority religions freedoms that we don't even grant to the majority of Americans? Do we afford Muslims freedoms to pray in our public schools, even provide a designated location for the prayer, yet at the same time we bend over backwards to ensure Christians are not afforded the same freedoms? Have we went so far to the left that we embrace Alla but shun God? They are not the same. And if you think they are, the same argument applies.
What do you think?
Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone with SprintSpeed
The separation of church and state argument has been going on for years and has even reached the point where a single person in California can impact the rights and lives of hundreds of thousands of others by protesting a "moment of silence" at the beginning of school, or the mention of God in the Pledge of Allegiance.
So, have we become such a politically correct (better termed ass-kissing) nation such that we hand cuff the majority of Americans at the demand of a few and at the same time afford minority religions freedoms that we don't even grant to the majority of Americans? Do we afford Muslims freedoms to pray in our public schools, even provide a designated location for the prayer, yet at the same time we bend over backwards to ensure Christians are not afforded the same freedoms? Have we went so far to the left that we embrace Alla but shun God? They are not the same. And if you think they are, the same argument applies.
What do you think?
Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone with SprintSpeed
Wednesday, January 28, 2009
How is it that.........
How is it that the Democrats have had control Congress for the last two years of the Bush Administration, the recession has been in full swing for just under two years, and President Bush gets the blame for the reckless spending of the government and the recession? How is it that the same Democrat controlled Congress that endorsed the spending under President Bush is now professing that they are the key to recovery via a ridiculous spending bill? How is the very same Congress that built the recession going to fix it with over $800 BILLION in new spending?
It doesn't add up folks. If you are one that thought we were mortgaging our children's future under the Democrat controlled Congress with President Bush in the White House, you better be really scared that we are going to be mortgaging our grand kids and great grand kids future with Democrat control of the Executive and Legislative branches of government!
Sunday, January 25, 2009
Lip Service from the New Administration
As our new President sets off to "change" America the lip service given to bipartisianship during the campaign is appearing to be just that, "lip service". In a recent closed door meeting (so much for transparency as was eluded to in the Obama inaugural address) many of the invited Republicans reported to the media that Obama told them to quit listening to Rush Limbaugh if they wanted to "get along" with democrats. In other words, do what Democrats want and we will all get along. Well, I guess that is a "change", a change in the definition of bipartisianship!
There were almost 60 million Americans that did not vote for Obama in the election. I guess if they're not democrats, or don't agree with the current democats, that want to "spread the wealth" then they simply don't count.
According to news reports, the new President, when confronted by a critic in the closed door meeting about the economic stimulus package, referenced his Presidential election victory as his card that can trump all other opinions regarding the economic stimulus package. Of course, he often said throughout the campaign and after the election was over that he wanted any and all inputs and ideas no matter their source....of course, thats just more lip service. It seems as if the illusion of change and bipartisianship is the objective of the new administration.
Thursday, January 22, 2009
Pelosi is an IDIOT!
The speaker of the House of Representatives, Nancy Pelosi-D, has
renewed her push to increase taxes on the top 2 tax brackets. She
professes this is the way to pay for the Obama-endorsed 825 billion
econ stimulus plan AND pay down the national deficit, which will
double if the 825B package is passed. So, in essence, she wants an
estimates 300B increase in gov't revenue by taxing the wealthy even
more, while she is spending 825B and doubling the deficit to approx. 2
trillion! So, Nancy, what about the remaining 1.7 trillion of deficit?
Perhaps the Speaker should give up her private jet that the tax payers
are footing the bill for! Perhaps she should push legislation that
bans "pork" from pending legislation. Perhaps she should tighten her
belt like she expects everyone else to do!
She is a disgrace to the USA and an IDIOT!
renewed her push to increase taxes on the top 2 tax brackets. She
professes this is the way to pay for the Obama-endorsed 825 billion
econ stimulus plan AND pay down the national deficit, which will
double if the 825B package is passed. So, in essence, she wants an
estimates 300B increase in gov't revenue by taxing the wealthy even
more, while she is spending 825B and doubling the deficit to approx. 2
trillion! So, Nancy, what about the remaining 1.7 trillion of deficit?
Perhaps the Speaker should give up her private jet that the tax payers
are footing the bill for! Perhaps she should push legislation that
bans "pork" from pending legislation. Perhaps she should tighten her
belt like she expects everyone else to do!
She is a disgrace to the USA and an IDIOT!
--
Sent from my mobile device
Wednesday, January 21, 2009
Hyphenated-America
America cannot and will not be united as one people until we, as Americans, become united as Americans, not hyphenated-Americans.
Caroline Kennedy a Front Runner for Hillary's US Senate seat????
After the media scrutinized Governor Palin's experience as a Mayor and the sitting Governor of Alaska, why is that same scrutiny not applied to Caroline Kennedy who has ZERO experience with anything remotely political other than her last name?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)