Are you sick and tired of seeing commercials by tax attorneys with former customers claiming, for example, "I owed over 800 thousand dollars in taxes and "so-and-so" tax firm made it so that I only had to pay 15 thousand."?
How about this...if you would have paid your damn taxes like the rest of us you wouldn't be in that position. How about those customers send every taxpayer in the country a "thank you" card because we picked up their slack.
I find it very frustrating, even anger inducing, that these leaches on America didn't pay their taxes and then do a commercial about how they made the rest of the taxpayers cover their slack! There is no excuse.
Of course, with our new executive branch and it's appointees not paying their taxes, or the penalties that accompany the late payment of taxes, I suppose the populous had a bad example, at least for 2009 and beyond.
Sunday, February 15, 2009
Thursday, February 12, 2009
The Republik of Kalifornia and its Followers
Virtually all the cable news networks (yes, even Fox News) have been completely fascinated with the single, poor, living with her parents, welfare-collecting, jobless, already a mother of 6 that was intentionally impregnated and had octuplets. While it really is not news that the reasonable people care about, the media continues to broadcast the story like the country's national security or well being is dependent on this woman's story. This is not news! It's the kind of stuff that Dr. Phil and Jerry Springer have made a living off of. Let them keep making a living and let the news media report real news!
Oh, wait a minute, perhaps a few more than a couple people care. Perhaps there are people that don't subscribe to tabloids that care. Who might these people be? Well, apparently there is an uproar in Kalifornia about who is paying for this woman and her 14 kids since she is jobless, poor and already leaching off the federal and state governments...collecting welfare.
First, let me reassure you that I am not a proponent of any type of welfare system. I think it creates a dependency on the government, reinforces laziness and removes personal responsibility from those that should be held accountable for their actions.
With that said, those in Kalifornia, and the rest of the country as well, that are complaining about paying for this woman and her 14 children, should have been complaining long ago, long before this particular woman had any children, perhaps even before this woman was born. They should have been complaining long ago when Kalifornia willingly began ignoring the influx of illegal aliens and paying for illegal aliens to reside in their state, but they didn't want to deal with the process of ridding the state of the infestation of illegal aliens. They should have demanded that the state deport those that are illegally here in the United States and send the bill to the government of Mexico. Now, with the largest population of criminals (illegal aliens) of any state in the Union, they decide to whine about who is paying for this American woman and her 14 kids. What about the over 11 million illegals that are leaching off the state and federal governments? Too late to start bitching now Kalifornia! You missed that opportunity.
Kalifornia has the largest debt of any state in the Union, approximately $41 BILLION. Imagine how much of that debt could have been prevented had the citizens demanded that the state deport the illegals long ago. Imagine how much of that debt could have been prevented had the state initiated action to deport illegals rather than sit on it's collective ass and claim that removing illegal aliens is the federal government's responsibility.
Kalifornia has over 11 million illegal aliens, criminals, that it is willingly supporting yet now there are those that are whining about an American woman and her 14 children. Are you kidding me?! That is absolutely ridiculous and is pure hypocrisy!
Oh, wait a minute, perhaps a few more than a couple people care. Perhaps there are people that don't subscribe to tabloids that care. Who might these people be? Well, apparently there is an uproar in Kalifornia about who is paying for this woman and her 14 kids since she is jobless, poor and already leaching off the federal and state governments...collecting welfare.
First, let me reassure you that I am not a proponent of any type of welfare system. I think it creates a dependency on the government, reinforces laziness and removes personal responsibility from those that should be held accountable for their actions.
With that said, those in Kalifornia, and the rest of the country as well, that are complaining about paying for this woman and her 14 children, should have been complaining long ago, long before this particular woman had any children, perhaps even before this woman was born. They should have been complaining long ago when Kalifornia willingly began ignoring the influx of illegal aliens and paying for illegal aliens to reside in their state, but they didn't want to deal with the process of ridding the state of the infestation of illegal aliens. They should have demanded that the state deport those that are illegally here in the United States and send the bill to the government of Mexico. Now, with the largest population of criminals (illegal aliens) of any state in the Union, they decide to whine about who is paying for this American woman and her 14 kids. What about the over 11 million illegals that are leaching off the state and federal governments? Too late to start bitching now Kalifornia! You missed that opportunity.
Kalifornia has the largest debt of any state in the Union, approximately $41 BILLION. Imagine how much of that debt could have been prevented had the citizens demanded that the state deport the illegals long ago. Imagine how much of that debt could have been prevented had the state initiated action to deport illegals rather than sit on it's collective ass and claim that removing illegal aliens is the federal government's responsibility.
Kalifornia has over 11 million illegal aliens, criminals, that it is willingly supporting yet now there are those that are whining about an American woman and her 14 children. Are you kidding me?! That is absolutely ridiculous and is pure hypocrisy!
Tuesday, February 10, 2009
Pork Loving Pelosi and the Liberal Media
Recently there has been information floating around about the Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi (D) of San Francisco, CA.
Interesting that Mrs. Pelosi, on the coat-tails of Obama, preached the negative aspects of "earmarks" and "pork" in legislation (of course after John McCain called the Democrats on it during the campaign), yet at the same time she added her own "pork" to the latest stimulus package designed to stimulate the economy.
"First Female Speaker of the House, and one of the dumbest (she was quoted as saying,"Natural Gas is a renewable resource") and most corrupt. You never hear about this in the media because it is not politically correct.
Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi's home district includes San Francisco . Star-Kist Tuna's headquarters are in San Francisco, Pelosi's home district. Star-Kist is owned by Del Monte Foods and is a major contributor to Pelosi. Star-Kist is the major employer in American Samoa employing 75% of the Samoan work force. Paul Pelosi, Nancy's husband, owns $17 million dollars of Star-Kist stock. In January, 2007 when the minimum wage was increased from $5.15 to $7.25, Pelosi had American Samoa exempted from the increase so Del Monte would not have to pay the higher wage. This would make Del Monte products less expensive than their competition's. Last week when the huge bailout bill was passed, Pelosi added an earmark to the final bill adding $33 million dollars for an 'economic development credit in American Samoa '.
Pelosi has called the Bush Administration "CORRUPT" ? ? "
How do you spell "HYPOCRISY" ?......P-E-L-O-S-I
How exactly is a $33 billion economic development credit going to "create jobs" in the United States as the Speaker and President have promised over and over and over and over that the "stimulus" bill would do?
Interesting that Mrs. Pelosi, on the coat-tails of Obama, preached the negative aspects of "earmarks" and "pork" in legislation (of course after John McCain called the Democrats on it during the campaign), yet at the same time she added her own "pork" to the latest stimulus package designed to stimulate the economy.
"First Female Speaker of the House, and one of the dumbest (she was quoted as saying,"Natural Gas is a renewable resource") and most corrupt. You never hear about this in the media because it is not politically correct.
Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi's home district includes San Francisco . Star-Kist Tuna's headquarters are in San Francisco, Pelosi's home district. Star-Kist is owned by Del Monte Foods and is a major contributor to Pelosi. Star-Kist is the major employer in American Samoa employing 75% of the Samoan work force. Paul Pelosi, Nancy's husband, owns $17 million dollars of Star-Kist stock. In January, 2007 when the minimum wage was increased from $5.15 to $7.25, Pelosi had American Samoa exempted from the increase so Del Monte would not have to pay the higher wage. This would make Del Monte products less expensive than their competition's. Last week when the huge bailout bill was passed, Pelosi added an earmark to the final bill adding $33 million dollars for an 'economic development credit in American Samoa '.
Pelosi has called the Bush Administration "CORRUPT" ? ? "
How do you spell "HYPOCRISY" ?......P-E-L-O-S-I
How exactly is a $33 billion economic development credit going to "create jobs" in the United States as the Speaker and President have promised over and over and over and over that the "stimulus" bill would do?
Friday, February 6, 2009
The Liberal Media and Their General Acceptance of Illegal Aliens
The American populous has been bombarded with non-stop stories of outrage regarding the single, poor, living with her parents, jobless, already a mother of 6 that just had octuplets. Fourteen children! Media outrage about who is paying for these kids, who is footing the medical bill and the long term welfare of the children is certainly justified. However, this same thing happens every day as illegal aliens cross our boarders and give birth to children in our hospitals. Who pays for them? Who provides care for them? We do folks, the American taxpayer! Where is the outrage and disgust over the billions we pay for criminals (illegal aliens) to have children in our hospitals?
Tuesday, February 3, 2009
Where is the liberal media now????
After the long and tough Presidential campaign between Obama and McCain, during which the liberal media's love affair with Obama was more than obvious, a great deal of attention and criticism was hurled at the McCain camp about the vetting process as it pertained to Gov. Sarah Palin.
Well, now the dust has settled, Obama is now President Obama, Senator McCain has returned to serving our nation as a Senator and Gov. Palin is doing Alaska's business.
President Obama has nominated more than a couple shady characters to fill the various secretary positions, even a new post he came up with. His nominee for and now confirmed Secretary of the Treasury has a more than questionable background as it applies to paying taxes, and now he is going to run the IRS. Tom Daschle withdrew his name from the nomination for Secretary of Health and Human Services due to the shady tax evasion practices he embraced. President Obama's own, brand new, "Performance" chief/secretary...whatever, has also withdrawn her name from consideration for unknown reasons (unknown so far).
With all that said, one cannot help but wonder where the liberal media has been. Where are the endless questions, commentary and speculations regarding the Obama administration's vetting process, or lack thereof, for the aforementioned characters? President Obama has been reported as saying that he still has confidence in the vetting process....what vetting process....
Well, now the dust has settled, Obama is now President Obama, Senator McCain has returned to serving our nation as a Senator and Gov. Palin is doing Alaska's business.
President Obama has nominated more than a couple shady characters to fill the various secretary positions, even a new post he came up with. His nominee for and now confirmed Secretary of the Treasury has a more than questionable background as it applies to paying taxes, and now he is going to run the IRS. Tom Daschle withdrew his name from the nomination for Secretary of Health and Human Services due to the shady tax evasion practices he embraced. President Obama's own, brand new, "Performance" chief/secretary...whatever, has also withdrawn her name from consideration for unknown reasons (unknown so far).
With all that said, one cannot help but wonder where the liberal media has been. Where are the endless questions, commentary and speculations regarding the Obama administration's vetting process, or lack thereof, for the aforementioned characters? President Obama has been reported as saying that he still has confidence in the vetting process....what vetting process....
Sunday, February 1, 2009
Bias
As I watch news report after news report about the dire straits of the people in KY and AR, particularly Louisville, KY, I can only wonder how much outrage and bitterness would be expressed via the media regarding the slow, and deficient response of the government if the President was a Republican.
I can't help but wonder how it is tied to the partisan split in the media. For example, after Hurricane Katrina, how long did it take the liberally slanted media to compalin about the lethargic response of the Bush Administration. Well, now that the media has gotten Barack Obama elected as our 44 th President, where is the outrage, where are the constant broadcasts showing outraged citizens of KY, where are the constant media complaints about the lethargic response of the Obama Administration to the 600K to 1 million people in KY alone that have been without power in freezing temperatures?
Wait a minute....could it possibly be because the majority of the population affected by the storm is not black? Could it be because the President is black (well half anyway), could it be because the media has a love affair with President Obama?
Where was the Red Cross when those in KY were powerless in freezing temperatures? Oh, wait a minute, perhaps the media NOW thinks it is the governor's responsibility. Why was it the President's responsibility when Katrina hit, but now it is the governor's responsibility? How come President Obama didn't activate hundreds of thousands of reserve military troops to assist in the rehabilitation of Louisville, for example? Why is the media not broadcasting over and over and over and over again the hardships of the American citizens of KY like they did in New Orleans? Hmmmmmmmmmm? Kind of makes one wonder a bit doesn't it!
What do you think?
I can't help but wonder how it is tied to the partisan split in the media. For example, after Hurricane Katrina, how long did it take the liberally slanted media to compalin about the lethargic response of the Bush Administration. Well, now that the media has gotten Barack Obama elected as our 44 th President, where is the outrage, where are the constant broadcasts showing outraged citizens of KY, where are the constant media complaints about the lethargic response of the Obama Administration to the 600K to 1 million people in KY alone that have been without power in freezing temperatures?
Wait a minute....could it possibly be because the majority of the population affected by the storm is not black? Could it be because the President is black (well half anyway), could it be because the media has a love affair with President Obama?
Where was the Red Cross when those in KY were powerless in freezing temperatures? Oh, wait a minute, perhaps the media NOW thinks it is the governor's responsibility. Why was it the President's responsibility when Katrina hit, but now it is the governor's responsibility? How come President Obama didn't activate hundreds of thousands of reserve military troops to assist in the rehabilitation of Louisville, for example? Why is the media not broadcasting over and over and over and over again the hardships of the American citizens of KY like they did in New Orleans? Hmmmmmmmmmm? Kind of makes one wonder a bit doesn't it!
What do you think?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)